The dubious science of online dating

[29] The Competitive Enterprise Institute has at times acknowledged that “Global warming is a reality.” [30] But CEI has also routinely disputed that global warming is a problem, contending that “There is no ‘scientific consensus’ that global warming will cause damaging climate change.” [31] These kinds of claims are nothing new for CEI. Back in 1991, CEI was claiming that “The greatest challenge we face is not warming, but cooling.” [32] More recently, CEI produced an ad calling for higher levels of carbon dioxide. [1] For years, AEI played a role in propagating misinformation about a manufactured controversy over emails stolen from climate scientists [2], with one AEI research fellow even claiming, “There was no consensus about the extent and causes of global warming.” [3] A resident scholar at AEI went so far as to state that the profession of climate scientist “threatens to overtake all” on the list of “most distrusted occupations.” [4] AEI received ,615,000 from Exxon Mobil from 1998-2012 [5], and more than

[29] The Competitive Enterprise Institute has at times acknowledged that “Global warming is a reality.” [30] But CEI has also routinely disputed that global warming is a problem, contending that “There is no ‘scientific consensus’ that global warming will cause damaging climate change.” [31] These kinds of claims are nothing new for CEI. Back in 1991, CEI was claiming that “The greatest challenge we face is not warming, but cooling.” [32] More recently, CEI produced an ad calling for higher levels of carbon dioxide. [1] For years, AEI played a role in propagating misinformation about a manufactured controversy over emails stolen from climate scientists [2], with one AEI research fellow even claiming, “There was no consensus about the extent and causes of global warming.” [3] A resident scholar at AEI went so far as to state that the profession of climate scientist “threatens to overtake all” on the list of “most distrusted occupations.” [4] AEI received $3,615,000 from Exxon Mobil from 1998-2012 [5], and more than $1 million in funding from Koch foundations from 2004-2011. [6] Americans for Prosperity (AFP) frequently provides a platform for climate contrarian statements, such as “How much information refutes carbon dioxide-caused global warming? An overwhelming majority of scientists agree — global warming is happening and human activity is the primary cause.

||

[29] The Competitive Enterprise Institute has at times acknowledged that “Global warming is a reality.” [30] But CEI has also routinely disputed that global warming is a problem, contending that “There is no ‘scientific consensus’ that global warming will cause damaging climate change.” [31] These kinds of claims are nothing new for CEI.

Back in 1991, CEI was claiming that “The greatest challenge we face is not warming, but cooling.” [32] More recently, CEI produced an ad calling for higher levels of carbon dioxide.

[1] For years, AEI played a role in propagating misinformation about a manufactured controversy over emails stolen from climate scientists [2], with one AEI research fellow even claiming, “There was no consensus about the extent and causes of global warming.” [3] A resident scholar at AEI went so far as to state that the profession of climate scientist “threatens to overtake all” on the list of “most distrusted occupations.” [4] AEI received $3,615,000 from Exxon Mobil from 1998-2012 [5], and more than $1 million in funding from Koch foundations from 2004-2011.

[6] Americans for Prosperity (AFP) frequently provides a platform for climate contrarian statements, such as “How much information refutes carbon dioxide-caused global warming?

An overwhelming majority of scientists agree — global warming is happening and human activity is the primary cause.

Yet several prominent global warming skeptic organizations are actively working to sow doubt about the facts of global warming.

[11] Koch foundations donated $3,609,281 to AFP Foundation from 2007-2011.

million in funding from Koch foundations from 2004-2011. [6] Americans for Prosperity (AFP) frequently provides a platform for climate contrarian statements, such as “How much information refutes carbon dioxide-caused global warming? An overwhelming majority of scientists agree — global warming is happening and human activity is the primary cause.

[50] Exxon Mobil contributed 0,000 to the Heritage Foundation from 2001-2012.

ALEC purports to “support the use of sound science to guide policy,” but routinely provides a one-sided platform for climate contrarians.

State legislators attending one ALEC meeting were offered a workshop touting a report by a fossil fuel-funded group that declared “like love, carbon dioxide's many splendors are seemingly endless." [14, 15] Another ALEC meeting featured a Fox News contributor who has claimed on the air that carbon dioxide “literally cannot cause global warming.” [16, 17] ALEC received more than

[50] Exxon Mobil contributed $780,000 to the Heritage Foundation from 2001-2012.

ALEC purports to “support the use of sound science to guide policy,” but routinely provides a one-sided platform for climate contrarians.

State legislators attending one ALEC meeting were offered a workshop touting a report by a fossil fuel-funded group that declared “like love, carbon dioxide's many splendors are seemingly endless." [14, 15] Another ALEC meeting featured a Fox News contributor who has claimed on the air that carbon dioxide “literally cannot cause global warming.” [16, 17] ALEC received more than $1.6 million from Exxon Mobil from 1998-2012 [18], and more than $850,000 from Koch foundations from 1997-2011.

[19] From its position as the research arm of the Department of Economics at Suffolk University, the Beacon Hill Institute (BHI) has published misleading analyses of clean energy and climate change policies in more than three dozen states.

These economic analyses are at times accompanied by a dose of climate contrarianism.

||

[50] Exxon Mobil contributed $780,000 to the Heritage Foundation from 2001-2012. ALEC purports to “support the use of sound science to guide policy,” but routinely provides a one-sided platform for climate contrarians. State legislators attending one ALEC meeting were offered a workshop touting a report by a fossil fuel-funded group that declared “like love, carbon dioxide's many splendors are seemingly endless." [14, 15] Another ALEC meeting featured a Fox News contributor who has claimed on the air that carbon dioxide “literally cannot cause global warming.” [16, 17] ALEC received more than $1.6 million from Exxon Mobil from 1998-2012 [18], and more than $850,000 from Koch foundations from 1997-2011. [19] From its position as the research arm of the Department of Economics at Suffolk University, the Beacon Hill Institute (BHI) has published misleading analyses of clean energy and climate change policies in more than three dozen states. These economic analyses are at times accompanied by a dose of climate contrarianism.

.6 million from Exxon Mobil from 1998-2012 [18], and more than 0,000 from Koch foundations from 1997-2011.

[19] From its position as the research arm of the Department of Economics at Suffolk University, the Beacon Hill Institute (BHI) has published misleading analyses of clean energy and climate change policies in more than three dozen states.

These economic analyses are at times accompanied by a dose of climate contrarianism.

Search for the dubious science of online dating:

the dubious science of online dating-66the dubious science of online dating-53

Let me count the ways.” [7] While claiming to be a grassroots organization, AFP has bolstered its list of “activists” by hosting “$1.84 Gas” events, where consumers who receive discounts on gasoline are asked to provide their name and email address on a “petition” form.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “the dubious science of online dating”